During the release of a new software product specialized to track spam, ACME Software

Inc notice that there was not as much traffic as they hoped to receive. During further

investigation, they found that they could not view their own website. At that moment, the

VP of sales received a call from the company’s broker stating that ACME Software Inc

stock fell 4 point due to lack of confidence. Several states away, spammers didn’t like the

idea of lower profit margins do to an easy to install spam blocking software so they

thought they would fight back. Earlier that day, they took control of hundreds of

compromised computers and used them as DoS zombies to attack ACME Software Inc’s

Internet servers in a vicious act of cyber assault. During an emergency press conference

the next morning, ACME Software Inc’s CIO announced his resignation as a result of a

several million dollar corporate loss.

Scenarios like the one above happen a more then people think and are more costly

then most will admit. Denial of Service (DoS) attacks are designed to deplete the

resources of a target computer system in an attempt to take a node off line by crashing or

overloading it. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) is a DoS attack that is engaged by

many different locations. The most common DDoS attacks are instigated through viruses

or zombie machines. There are many reasons that DoS attacks are executed, and most of

them are out of malicious intent. DoS attacks are almost impossible to prevent if you are

singled out as a target. It’s difficult to distinguish the difference between a legitimate

packet and one used for a DoS attack.

The purpose of this article is to give the reader with basic network knowledge a

better understanding of the challenges presented by Denial of Service attacks, how they

work, and ways to protect systems and networks from them.

Instigation:

Spoofing – Falsifying an Internet address (know as spoofing) is the method an attacker

uses to fake an IP address. This is used to reroute traffic to a target network node or used

to deceive a server into identifying the attacker as a legitimate node. When most of us

think of this approach of hacking, we think of someone in another city essentially

becoming you. The way TCP/IP is designed, the only way a criminal hacker or cracker

can take over your Internet identity in this fashion is to blind spoof. This means that the

impostor knows exactly what responses to send to a port, but will not get the

corresponding response since the traffic is routed to the original system. If the spoofing is

designed around a DoS attack, the internal address becomes the victim. Spoofing is used

in most of the well-known DoS attacks. Many attackers will start a DoS attack to drop a

node from the network so they can take over the IP address of that device. IP Hijacking is

the main method used when attacking a secured network or attempting other attacks like

the Man in the Middle attack.

SYN Flood – Attackers send a series of SYN requests to a target (victim). The target

sends a SYN ACK in response and waits for an ACK to come back to complete the

session set up. Instead of responding with an ACK, the attacker responds with another

SYN to open up a new connection. This causes the connection queues and memory buffer

to fill up, thereby denying service to legitimate TCP users. At this time, the attacker can

hijack the system’s IP address if that is the end goal. Spoofing the “source” IP address

when sending a SYN flood will not only cover the offender’s tracks, but is also a method

of attack in itself. SYN Floods are the most commonly used DoS in viruses and are easy

to write. See http://www.infosecprofessionals.com/code/synflood.c.txt

Smurf Attack- Smurf and Fraggle attacks are the easiest to prevent. A perpetrator sends a

large number of ICMP echo (ping) traffic at IP broadcast addresses, using a fake source

address. The “source” or spoofed address will be flooded with simultaneous replies (See

CERT Advisory: CA-1998-01). This can be prevented by simply blocking broadcast

traffic from remote network sources using access control lists.

Fraggle Attack – This types of attack is the same as a Smurf attack except using UDP

instead if TCP. By sending an UDP echo (ping) traffic to IP broadcast addresses, the

systems on the network will all respond to the spoofed address and affect the target

system. This is a simple rewrite of the Smurf code. This can be prevented by simply

blocking broadcast traffic from remote IP address.

Ping of Death – An attacker sends illegitimate ICMP (ping) packets larger than 65,536

bytes to a system with the intention of crashing it. These attacks have been outdated since

the days of NT4 and Win95.

Teardrop – Otherwise known as an IP fragmentation attack, this DoS attack targets

systems that are running Windows NT 4.0, Win95 , Linux up to 2.0.32. Like the Ping of

Death, the Teardrop is no longer effective.

Application Attack – Thess are DoS attacks that involve exploiting an application

vulnerability causing the target program to crash or restart the system.

Kazaa and Morpheus have a known flaw that will allow an attacker to consume all

available bandwidth without being logged.

See http://www.infosecprofessionals.com/code/kazaa.pl.txt

Microsoft’s IIS 5 SSL also has an easy way to exploit vulnerability. Most exploits like

these are easy to find on the Internet and can be copied and pasted as working code.

There are thousands of exploits that can be used to DoS a target system/application. See

http://www.infosecprofessionals.com/code/IIS5SSL.c.txt

Viruses, Worms, and Antivirus – Yes, Antivirus. Too many cases where the antivirus

configuration is wrong or the wrong edition is installed. This lack of foresight causes an

unintentional DDoS attack on the network by taking up valuable CPU resources and

bandwidth. Viruses and worms also cause DDoS attacks by the nature of how they

spread. Some purposefully attack an individual target after a system has been infected.

The Blaster worm that exploits the DCOM RPC vulnerability (described in Microsoft

Security Bulletin MS03-026) using TCP port 135 is a great example of this. The Blaster

targeted Microsoft’s windows update site by initiating a SYN FLOOD. Because of this,

Microsoft decided to no longer resolve the DNS for ‘windowsupdate.com’.

DoS attacks are impossible to stop. However, there are things you can do to

mitigate potential damages they may cause to your environment. The main thing to

remember is that you always need to keep up-to-date on the newest threats.

Mitigation:

Antivirus software – Installing an antivirus software with the latest virus definitions will

help prevent your system from becoming a DoS zombie. Now, more then ever, this is an

important feature that you must have. With lawsuits so prevalent, not having the proper

protection can leave you open for downstream liability.

Software updates – Keep your software up to date at all times. This includes antivirus,

email clients, and network servers. You also need to keep all network Operating Systems

installed with the latest security patches. Microsoft has done a great job with making

these patches available for their Windows distributions. Linux has been said to be more

secure, but the patches are far more scarce. RedHat is planning on incorporating the

NSA’s SE Linux kernel into future releases. This will give Mandatory Access Control

(MAC) capabilities to the Linux community.

Network protection – Using a combination of firewalls and Intrusion Detection Systems

(IDS) can cut down on suspicious traffic and can make the difference between logged

annoyance and your job. Firewalls should be set to deny all traffic that is not specifically

designed to pass through. Integrating an IDS will warn you when strange traffic is present

on your network. This will assist you in finding and stopping attacks.

Network device configuration – Configuring perimeter devices like routers can detect

and in some cases prevent DoS attacks. Cisco routers can be configured to actively

prevent SYN attacks starting in Cisco IOS 11.3 and higher using the TCP intercept

command in global configuration mode.

Access-list number {deny | permit} tcp any destination destination-wildcard

ip tcp intercept list access-list-number

ip tcp intercept ? (will give you a good list of other options.)

Cisco routers can prevent Smurf and Fraggle attacks by blocking broadcast traffic. Since

Cisco IOS 12.0, this is the default configuration. ACLs or access control lists should also

be configured on all interfaces.

No ip directed-broadcast

The Cisco router can also be used to prevent IP spoofing.

ip access-group list in interface

access-list number deny icmp any any redirect

access-list number deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any

access-list number deny ip 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 any

access-list number deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any

See Improving Security on Cisco Routers – http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/21.html

Old Cisco IOS versions are vulnerable to several DoS attacks. The “Black Angels” wrote

a program called Cisco Global Exploiter. This is a great software to use when testing the

security of your Cisco router version and configuration and can be found at

http://www.blackangels.it/Projects/cge.htm

Security is not as mystical as people believe. DoS attacks come in many different

types and can be devastating if you don’t take the proper precautions. Keep up to date and

take steps to secure network nodes. Keeping security in mind can minimize damages,

downtime, and save your career.

http://digitalcyberpro.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Info-security-1024x1024.jpghttp://digitalcyberpro.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Info-security-150x150.jpgcyberproscyberpro
During the release of a new software product specialized to track spam, ACME Software Inc notice that there was not as much traffic as they hoped to receive. During further investigation, they found that they could not view their own website. At that moment, the VP of sales received a call from...